A Game of Chinese Whispers
A GAME OF CHINESE WHISPERS
Nikhil Reddy Kothakota, Symbiosis
Law School, Hyderabad, 2nd year , BA LLB
Editorial Note: In this blog post,
the author expresses an opinion about why it is important to introduce law
students to the concept of objectivity.
Once when I was 12 and the class was playing the game of
Chinese whispers, the intended “Grandma fed her cats” through the succession of
ears and whispers down the line became “Grandma baked her cats” and that is the
effect of information passing down, diluted and mutated in form. Having said
that...
Welcome to your law school, here your teeth grind against
each other and your ears are sharp in anticipation, with your eyes looking out.
Here, the entire world looks like an arena or a battlefield and the romanticism
of every TV show with young lawyers and attorneys will soon be lost on you. You
will smile with a certain nostalgia when you look at young hopeful students who
rush into morning classes like there’s no tomorrow.
Quite evidently, every law school is different from the
others, and we like to point out how ours is better than say, the next one.
Most things remain but same all throughout, but what you will encounter around
every corner, every dusty quaint classroom or even while taking leisurely night
strolls along the campus wall is an opinion. A whole plethora of opinions
surrounds us, being jumbled into a mix, an amalgamated mass that is so nauseous
and inefficient by the end of the day, that no real change can be made it.
However, everyone is proud of having one and you will hear us say, “We will
stick to our view even if it means death”.
It is quite understandable and natural for one to desire to
express oneself. After all, every human being is entitled to their own opinion,
for it is a quintessential component of his or her being. So let us not go into
the intricacies of free speech but rather consider the basis of your
opinion—where do you get your news from? Which pots brew which stories?
I can dismiss every other news source that does not support my
personal viewpoint as ‘fake news’ (the term that is in vogue these days),
dismissed with a wave of hand, with the words FAKE NEWS splattered across the
pages in red, glaring red!
In a world full of double standards, double entendres and
hidden motives, it is easy for facts to get lost in a wave of cynicism, with
the war on opposing ideologies, satire and ridicule culminating into a heaping mess of
insufferable hosh posh.
It is here that objectivity of the mind comes to play,
through what is known as common parlance as ‘fact checking’. The importance of
having a mind free from all biases cannot be stressed upon enough especially in
these times where the media is pushing opinions onto the public, in order to
separate political or socio-economic commentary from raw set of facts, which
take up very less reading space compared to the former. It is difficult to be
indifferent to all the noise that surrounds us but we must view the world with
almost disinterest in order to be a judge of our cause, a judge who rules over
his own passions.
It is this idea which needs to be taught in every law
school—the concept of objectivity—if not as a separate course, then engrained
into the intricacies of the curriculum itself, not for the sake of research
papers or gleaning certifications, but as a moral duty we owe and have taken
up, especially being part of a field of education where activism plays an
important part. We, law students need to be trained to be someone who can
balance the riling emotions of believers, with the most intricately painted
picture, true in colour, form and shape in a world where perception and
portrayal, intention and outcome coincide, in such a way we do not end up
giving poor old grandma a heart attack, when she is at the receiving end.
Comments
Post a Comment