A Few Subjects that Indian Law Universities should teach at the Undergraduate level but don’t
A FEW SUBJECTS THAT INDIAN LAW UNIVERSITIES SHOULD TEACH AT THE
UNDERGRADUATE LEVEL BUT DON’T
Suman Kumari, 1st Year, Indore Institute of Law, Madhya Pradesh
Editorial Note: In this blog, the author speaks about some of the
subjects which need to be taught in Indian law universities in light of the
demands of a professional career in law.
Every
time we think of law as a career, we tend to think of law universities, which
are essentially single discipline universities which offer degrees at various levels
of study to aspirants. The curriculum in such universities includes all the law
subjects that are deemed to be necessary to become a lawyer, ranging from
Contract law to Torts.
Even
though at a preliminary level, it may appear that the subjects taught at the
undergraduate level are adequate for legal training, it is argued that there
are some key subjects which are still missing from the list of courses, which can
potentially affect the formation of responsible agents future of country i.e. lawyers
with good communication skills, analytical skills, research skills, people
skills and creativity. These are after all, some of the characteristics which
every lawyer should possess. However, upon analysis of the list of subjects
generally offered at the undergraduate level in law courses in Indian
universities, it appears that the subjects which can potentially help students
to be good lawyers are missing.
It
is argued that since one of the important qualities any lawyer should possess is
good communication skills, universities should add Public Speaking as
one of their subjects taught at universities. This will help students to avoid
nervousness while putting across their points and curb ‘stage fright’ which is
common among several new law graduates.
Further,
in the words of James Caballero, “I advise my students to listen carefully the
moment they decide to take no more math courses. They might be able to hear the
sound of closing doors.”1 It is thus, another major
subjects missing in law universities. After all, without Mathematics, could we imagine to exist in this universe devoid of
any knowledge of numbers? It is argued that the general perspective that
mathematics need not be learnt by lawyers leaves many unanswered questions
behind, such as how will a lawyer who is not acquainted with numbers be good
with dealing with legal issues involving complicated finances or whether a
lawyer with little knowledge of mathematics will be able to decipher the
economic motivations of lawmakers.
In
addition to this, two of the most basic and important subjects that are avoided
in Indian law universities are Analytical Reasoning and Logical
Reasoning. It is argued that knowledge of these subjects is crucial
since all lawyers should be analytical in their approach and strictly logical
while attempting to resolve the complicated issues that their clients are
embroiled in.
In
this context, it is important to note that the future demands the best version
of every person for their betterment. However, if Indian law universities miss
out on imparting lessons in these essential subjects to their students, how can
we expect the students to be the best at their work? Becoming a lawyer is not an easy task. In
fact, it takes a lot of time, effort and intelligence choices to kick start a
career in law. In this process, law universities plays a pivotal role and so if
these universities miss out on subjects that should be taught at the
undergraduate level, the future of budding lawyers will have to bear the
consequences.
____________
1. James Caballero, Everybody a mathematician?, (Fall
1989), CAIP Quarterly Volume 2 Issue 2, page 2.
Comments
Post a Comment